Thinkstick!

  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Resume
  • About
  • Reusable Dry Cleaning Bag/Hamper from Greenward

    dry-cleaning-bag.jpg

    As a professional organizer, we find dry cleaning bags to be irksome for a couple reasons. The environmental waste is obvious. But from a closet organizing perspective, we see a lot of clothes organizing systems break down when people bring home their dry cleaning…

    One of the most user-friendly ways to organize your clothes is usually by category (e.g. shirts together, pants together etc.). For those who do a lot of dry cleaning, they bring home a batch of mixed category clothes, wrapped in one plastic hanging bag and usually people just toss that on the closet rod and the category system is rendered null and void.

    Greenward, a great eco products store in Cambridge, is now selling a reusable dry cleaning bag which doubles as a hamper. While you’re accumulating your dry cleaning stash, the bag is in hamper format. Then you bring the hamper to the dry cleaner and they revert it to the hanging bag format to protect your clothes in transit. When you get home, in order to start your hamper cycle all over again you must remove the clothes from the bag, and that’s your chance to put them into the proper categories in your closet!

    And it really is disheartening to see the amount of plastic bags that accumulate in people’s closets from dry cleaning. The Greenward reusable bag/hamper is a simple way to reduce your impact. (Greenward also has an online shop and delivers by bicycle!) Of course, choosing clothes that don’t need to be dry cleaned is the first step but that’s not an option for everyone. Also, if you haven’t already switched to a greener dry cleaning service, there are a number in the Boston area, including Clevergreen in Medford and Beacon Hill.

    Most dry cleaners will also accept your returned wire hangers or you can drop them at a local Salvation Army or Goodwill for reuse.

    How do you manage your dry cleaning? Any other greener dry cleaners in the Boston area that you’d recommend?

    Published by  Published by xFruits

    Original source : http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/apartmenttherapy/ma…

    November 12, 2008
  • Robert Reich's Blog: The Mini Depression and the Maximum-Strength Remedy

    Shared by Moah

    I discovered this post from Scoble’s shared items. The power of Google Reader!

    I am more than glad Obama picked people with this kind of view to be on his economic advisory team.

    So the crucial questions become (1) how much will the government have to spend to get the economy back on track? and (2) what sort of spending will have the biggest impact on jobs and incomes?

    The answer to the first question is “a lot.” Given the magnitude of the mess and the amount of underutilized capacity in the economy– people who are or will soon be unemployed, those who are underemployed, factories shuttered, offices empty, trucks and containers idled — government may have to spend $600 or $700 billion next year to reverse the downward cycle we’re in.

    The answer to the second question is mostly “infrastructure” — repairing roads and bridges, levees and ports; investing in light rail, electrical grids, new sources of energy, more energy conservation. Even conservative economists like Harvard’s Martin Feldstein are calling for government to stimulate the economy through infrastructure spending. Infrastructure projects like these pack a double-whammy: they create lots of jobs, and they make the economy work better in the future. (Important qualification: To do this correctly and avoid pork, the federal government will need to have a capital budget that lists infrastructure projects in order of priority of public need.)

    Government should also spend on health care and child care. These expenditures are also double whammies: they, too, create lots of jobs, and they fulfill vital public needs.

    Expect two sorts of arguments against this. The first will come from fiscal hawks who claim that the government is already spending way too much. Even without a new stimulus package, next year’s budget deficit could run over a trillion dollars, given the amounts to be spent bailing out Wall Street and perhaps the auto industry, and providing extended unemployment insurance and other measures to help those in direct need. The hawks will argue that the nation can’t afford giant deficits, especially when baby boomers are only a few years away from retiring and claiming Social Security and Medicare.

    They’re wrong. Government spending that puts people back to work and invests in the future productivity of the nation is exactly what the economy needs right now. Deficit numbers themselves have no significance. The pertinent issue is how much underutilized capacity exists in the economy. When there’s lots of idle capacity, deficit spending is entirely appropriate, as John Maynard Keynes taught us. Moving the economy to fuller capacity will of itself shrink future deficits.

    The second argument will come from conservative supply-siders who will call for income-tax cuts rather than spending increases. They’ll claim that individuals with more money in their pockets will get the economy moving again more readily than can government. They’re wrong, for three reasons. First, income-tax cuts go mainly to upper-income people who tend to save rather than spend. Most Americans pay more in payroll taxes than in income taxes. Second, even if a rebate could be fashioned, people tend to use those extra dollars to pay off their debts rather than buy new goods and services, as we witnessed a few months ago when the government sent out rebate checks. Third, even when individuals purchase goods and services, those purchases tend not to generate as many American jobs as government spending on the same total scale because much of what consumers buy comes from abroad.

    Fiscal hawks and conservative supply siders notwithstanding, a major stimulus is in order. Government is the spender of last resort, and the nation is coming close to its last resort.

    Published by  Published by xFruits

    Original source : http://robertreich.blogspot.com/2008/11/mini-depre…

    November 11, 2008
  • Wanna Work For Stamen Design?

    Shared by Moah

    If I was a developer or if I had the patience to fight with code or if the job posting was for a designer, I’d totally apply. So my developer friends, apply. They do the coolest visualizations on the web. Digg Labs, Hindsight are both very innovative and not just at the edge, they define where the edge is.

    I don’t normally put up job postings, but this opportunity is too cool not to. Stamen Design, in San Francisco, has an opening for a full-time developer to “make their ideas feasible.” If you follow visualization on the Web, no doubt you’ve come across some of their work – somewhere in between analytical and art. There’s the Digg Labs stuff, Trulia Hindsight, Twitter Blocks, Cabpotting, and plenty of other fun stuff.

    Here’s part of the job description:

    You'll be working with a small team of designers and engineers who will be looking to you to make their ideas feasible. You're excited by the possibility of cutting and bending data to fit it through the thin straw of the internet. You can look at a source of information and model it as resources, rows and columns, messages and queues. You have the programming experience necessary to write data processors and servers, the system administration experience to inhabit and actively guide a constantly-shifting technical environment of free & open source software, and the patience & grace to grant that PHP and spreadsheets might be appropriate tools when circumstances require the quick and the dirty.

    You must have the willingness and ability to discuss the finer points of HTTP, SQL, RESTful API's, response formats and resource consumption. You understand that the perfect is often the enemy of the good, and your pragmatism & flexibility show themselves in functional systems. You can see the connections between technical infrastructure and the interactive design & visualization it supports.

    We’re less concerned with how long you’ve worked than with how good you are. You will need to have been paid to do good work; the skill that comes from delivering work for money can’t be learned in any other way. You maintain a state of constant learning to keep up with new work in your field, participate in communities of practice connected to your expertise, and experiment with new techniques in personal projects.

    Go here for the complete details.

    [via teczno]

    Published by  Published by xFruits

    Original source : http://flowingdata.com/2008/11/11/wanna-work-for-s…

    November 11, 2008
  • Conscientious Cook: The Cost of Running Kitchen Appliances

    2008_11_6-Appliances.jpgElizabeth’s post from a few weeks ago on costing out a home-cooked meal got us thinking about the average cost of running our kitchen appliances. Did you know that a slow-cooker on the high setting uses about 150 watts and costs roughly 2-cents per hour? Hear more after the jump!

    posted originally from: TheKitchn

    In our research on their site, we came across First Energy, which serves the Akron, Ohio area. They offer a handy guide that includes a breakdown of the cost to run each appliance in your house along with some tips on saving energy. (The link to this guide is at the bottom of this post.)

    They estimate their costs based on 11-cents per kilowatt-hour and give instructions for how to calculate your cost if the price per kilowatt-hour is different in your area.

    Here are some of their estimates:

    โ€ข Refrigerator-Freezer and Auto-Defrost (20-24 cubic feet): 600 watts, $10.27/month
    โ€ข Microwave Oven (estimating 30 minutes per day): 1500 watts, $2.49/month
    โ€ข Garbage Disposal (estimating 5 minutes per day): 800 watts, $.22/day
    โ€ข Dishwasher (wash cycle only): 300 watts, $.04/use

    Some of this energy use and their prices may seem insignificant, but it does add up. We think that even trimming down use on a few appliances or switching to more energy-saving appliances can make a difference over the long run.

    What do you think?

    โ€ข Making Cents of Electricity from the First Energy Corporation (opens to a .pdf)

    Related: Conscientious Cook: How to Start Saving Money This Week

    (Image: Flickr member Andy Leitch licensed under Creative Commons)

    Published by Published by xFruits

    Original source : http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/apartmenttherapy/re…

    November 10, 2008
  • Relief From Old Building Syndrome: USB Gloves

    If your office building is old (like mine), and you are nowhere near those old-school radiator heaters that line the walls (like me), and the windows are not exactly “double-paned” to keep the heat in (you know it), there’s a good chance you will be f-f-f-freezing come Winter. So what can you do, other than huddle by the heat of your desktop? Get some USB Heated Gloves, that’s what.

    The good part about these USB gloves is the open fingers that will still allow you to type up that TPS report in no time, since there’s no fabric hindering your keystrokes.

    Plus, you can heat each one individually (you know, in case your right hand is colder than your left) and connect them to your PS2 and Xbox 360 for toasty, warm gaming. And for only $25 bucks, they may even make a funny stocking stuffer for the zombie-handed female in your life! You know who I mean.

    Oh, and for using your iPhone in the cold weather? Well, that’s when you pick up a pair of these classy gloves.

    Published by  Published by xFruits

    Original source : http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/geeksugar/~3/Bcu8i1…

    November 8, 2008
  • Gore: Electrifying redemption, thanks to the Web

    Former Vice President Al Gore onstage at the Web 2.0 Summit.

    (Credit: Dan Farber/CNET News)

    SAN FRANCISCO–The central theme of former Vice President Al Gore’s speech, concluding the Web 2.0 Summit on Friday afternoon, was electricity.

    He spoke of “the electrifying redemption of America’s revolutionary declaration that all human beings are created equal,” as emphasized through Barack Obama’s election victory on Tuesday, and how it “would not have been possible without the additional empowerment of individuals to use knowledge as a source of power that has come with the Internet.”

    Gore reiterated what so many people have said before–that the Obama campaign was a vindication for how the new tools of the Internet can be used toward legitimate change.

    “What happened in the election opens up a full new range of possibilities, and now is the time to really move swiftly to use these new possibilities,” he said. “I made a talk earlier today about how the early uses of electricity 100 years ago were aimed at sort of specialized applications and gimmicks and do-dads and whiz-bangs that demonstrated the special qualities of this new conveyor of power.”

    He meant, essentially, throwing an electric sheep. (Apologies to Philip K. Dick.)

    “Now we just take electricity for granted as everywhere, and it has empowered a whole civilization,” he said. Gore said the analogy stands for Web 2.0 as well. “When people are displaying interactivity or user-generated content or social networking, that’s kind of the gee-whiz stuff…We need to move past that.”

    Electricity, too, is key to Gore’s urgent call to action, which he detailed with an immediacy that was needed at a conference where some panels drifted a little too far into the speculative future. America needs a “unified national smart grid” distributing renewable solar energy across the country, something he estimates would cost $400 billion in a decade. But it would create thousands of jobs, Gore said, and it would pay for itself within three years.

    When Obama takes office in January, Gore said the new president ought to set “a national goal of getting 100 percent of America’s electricity from renewable and noncarbon sources within 10 years. We can do that.”

    He continued: “The declaration from President Kennedy that we would land a man on the moon and bring him back safely was thought by many to be impossible.”

    Gore had come onstage at the conference to a standing ovation and so much applause that he had to tell the audience to quiet down. His story is familiar: he famously won the popular vote for the presidency in 2000 but lost the electoral vote to George W. Bush, and he went on to win both an Academy Award for his environmental-awareness documentary An Inconvenient Truth and the Nobel Peace Prize last year.

    In 2005, Gore founded Current TV, a cable news network that he created with Joel Hyatt in response to his dissatisfaction with the television industry. “One of the main reasons why our political system has not been operating very well until this election is the deadening influence of the television medium as it has been operated,” he said.

    Gore encouraged the digerati in the audience to keep pushing forward as they face what he says is the most pressing struggle of our time, climate change–the subject matter of An Inconvenient Truth. The fact that the Web’s candidate of choice won this time is no reason to rest easy, he said. Media democratization needs to continue evolving.

    “Just as Barack Obama’s election would’ve been impossible without the new dialogue and new ways of interacting–the Web–the only way (climate change) is going to be solved is by addressing the democracy crisis, and the country hit a great blow for victory this week, but we have to take this issue and raise it in the awareness of everyone,” Gore said. “I think that it is very much in its infancy, barely beginning, and I think that we are not many years away from television sort of sinking into the digital world and becoming a part of it.”

    Cynics might say Gore, who calls himself a “recovering politician,” is still bitter at a sterilized news media that didn’t sufficiently back his calling in the 2000 presidential election. Needless to say, his views remain controversial. But onstage, Gore seemed plenty comfortable in his new role as a thought leader rather than an elected official.

    “Who knew that you were the guru of Web 2.0, as well as global warming?” conference organizer Tim O’Reilly asked Gore jokingly after the former vice president had illustrated an analogy involving “crowdsourced” information and cloud computing, two of the decade’s most buzzworthy digital talking points.

    If the audience was any indication, Gore has gained resounding acceptance as an information-age guru, a bit of an irony, considering that 10 years ago, erroneous reports circulated that he had once claimed to have invented the Internet.

    “When we have really had these great leaps forward has been when new information ecoystems have made it possible for individuals who are thinking and processing information, and who have aspirations and hopes…to connect easily with lots of voters around core ideas,” Gore explained. His preferred analogy was the invention of the printing press five centuries ago, in which he connected general historical events to the rise of literacy and eventually the creation of democratic governments.

    “The installation of a new sovereign, the rule of reason, and the emergence of a marketplace of ideas that was accessible to individuals–that really empowered this kind of collective intelligence,” Gore said. “And the American constitution could be, by analogy, a brilliant piece of software that regularly harvested the results of that.”

    An audience member asked Gore how much he thought governments should regulate Internet use, and Gore fired back, “As little as possible.” There was more applause, and as he left the stage, there was yet another standing ovation.

    Gore might not have invented the Internet (or even claimed to do so). But if the Web 2.0 Summit was any indication, plenty of Silicon Valley’s most loyal are more than happy to have him help reinvent it.

    Published by  Published by xFruits

    Original source : http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/webware/~3/44608409…

    November 8, 2008
  • The sad lie of mediocrity

    Shared by Alex

    I’ve always thought this way about rush. 4% less means not closing the deal with the pledges, or not postering quite enough, or not having the brothers awake to make every single event go smoothly. Every house has so much competition during rush that being mediocre just doesn’t cut it.

    Knowing that they went the extra 4% every single time makes what the brothers, Peter, and Tom accomplished even more impressive. Congrats, guys.

    Doing 4% less does not get you 4% less.

    Doing 4% less may very well get you 95% less.

    That’s because almost good enough gets you nowhere. No sales, no votes, no customers. The sad lie of mediocrity is the mistaken belief that partial effort yields partial results. In fact, the results are usually totally out of proportion to the incremental effort.

    Big organizations have the most trouble with this, because they don’t notice the correlation. It’s hidden by their momentum and layers of bureaucracy. So a mediocre phone rep or a mediocre chef may not appear to be doing as much damage as they actually are.

    The flip side of this is that when you are at the top, the best in the world, the industry leader, a tiny increase in effort and quality can translate into huge gains. For a while, anyway.

    Published by  Published by xFruits

    Original source : http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/sethsmainbl…

    November 7, 2008
  • Election maps

    Shared by Moah

    I saw these sets of maps after 04 election. They did it again for 2008. 04 and 08 side by side comparison would be interesting to see as well.

    Thanks, Jim Storer for the tweet with the link.

    Here are the 2008 presidential election results on a population cartogramof this type:

    Published by  Published by xFruits

    Original source : http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/…

    November 6, 2008
  • Sprint Dashboard to the Universe – Plug Into Now

    Shared by Moah

    one crazy dashboard. This is what I call information overload. Still, is it really the future?

    Sprint, in a promotion to their mobile Internet service, created this amusing futuristic dashboard. “All aboard the now machine,” the computer says. “How about a big bowl of now?… Please keep your hands inside the moment…your hair has grown 5 millionths of centimeter in the last second.” It’s got tickers for eggs being produced, emails being sent, spam emails being received, recent news from The New York Times, CNN, newsvine, top Google searches of the day, and most importantly, seconds until doughnut day. That’d be a nice little screensaver – or something I’d have running 24/7 on a giant plasma.

    Oh, and yes, that is my face in the middle.

    Published by  Published by xFruits

    Original source : http://flowingdata.com/2008/11/06/sprint-dashboard…

    November 6, 2008
  • Last Night's CNN Hologram Technology: Freaky and Amazing

    Shared by Moah

    Matrix-ish? I don’t know my sci fi movies that well. Off to look for the youtube clip of this.

    During last night’s election coverage, I found myself bouncing around from high-def channel to high-def channel, seeing what ABC, CNN, Fox, and MSNBC had to offer. I already knew that CNN correspondent John King would be showcasing election news from the high-tech Multi-Touch Collaboration Wall, but I had no idea CNN would take their techiness to the next level.

    Were you as shocked as I was when they showed correspondent Jessica Yellin in “hollographic 3D form?” Turns out this impressive technology was made possible by Vizrt and SportVu with the help of 44 HD cameras and 20 computers. The A+ geekiness award definitely went to CNN last night!

    Did you happen to see it in action? What would you think if they used “virtual” correspondents regularly?

    Published by  Published by xFruits

    Original source : http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/geeksugar/~3/41Mr2l…

    November 5, 2008
โ†Previous Page
1 2 3 4 5 6 … 8
Next Pageโ†’

Thinkstick!

Proudly powered by WordPress